Classified Top Secret

Sections:

• Discovery and identification
• Composition and size
• Origin and trajectory
• Analysis of structures
• Analysis of movement
• Threat assessment scenarios:
  • Interstellar probe
  • Mining endeavor
  • Habitation
  • Thrust device
  • Weaponry
• Threat of global unrest
• Conclusion

New versions of this report will be released as further information is available.

Forward:

Comet I/2025E1 or “Armastus-1” has sparked a flurry of public interest around the globe and raised new concerns for domestic and international defense. Questions surrounding the nature of, intent behind, and eventual outcome of Comet Armastus-1’s path through our planetary system abound.

This report aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of the present available information on Comet Armastus-1 as well as posit multiple theories on its nature, and establish several potential scenarios relating to its purpose and intent.

The situation is rapidly evolving and information, theories, and data in this report should not be used for military, political or personal decisions if newer or more accurate information becomes available.

Section one: Discovery and identification.

On March 3^rd 2025 at 3:02AM pacific time, the comet was detected on a routine observation by Palomar Observatory in California. Designation I/2025E1 “Armastus-1” was assigned upon determination of the comet’s nature as an interstellar object, originating beyond the solar system. This determination was made at 2:30pm that day. The California Institute of Technology owns and operates Palomar Observatory and has made many discoveries of unrelated comets, as well as identifying the existence of the 2 trailing comets: I/2025E2 “Armastus-2” and I/2025E3 “Armastus-3” on a nearly identical trajectory and speed relative to earths orbit to Armastus-1. No further Armastus comets have been identified at this time.

Palomar Observatory began initial analysis of the comet and it’s trajectory immediately, due to its projected path close to earth. The US Department of Defense was not notified. On March 4^th at 12:03am it was determined that the comet would not impact the planet. On March 6^th Palomar detected unusual radiation from the surface of Armastus-1. The radiation was inconsistent with known natural phenomenon and sparked immediate academic interest. The use of several other observatories as well as the James Webb Space Telescope was requested and approved.

Initial observation showed an unusual formation at the location where the radiation had been detected. The formations were identified as being composed of a Titanium Alloy and an as of yet unidentified material. The structure was identified as a cylinder standing 32.1 Meters in height and 25.3 meters in diameter.  By late March 6^th the theory had been posited that the formations were not a natural formation, but instead an artificial structure. Over the next three days teams of researchers across the United States verified the information while maintaining internal secrecy. The US Department of Defense was not notified.

On March 10^th, a full week after discovery, Palomar Observatory collected the gathered data and sent it to the US Department of Defense. The report included an explanation from Palomar Observatory that they believed the structures to be of extraterrestrial origin.

A further four smaller structures, arranged symmetrically around the cylinder, were identified on March 12^th. Motion, as discussed in part five, was detected shortly before the US Press Conference on March 14^th that disclosed the existence of the structures to the public.

Section Two: Composition and size

Comet I/2025 E1 is a relatively moderate example of a comet with a 78,000-kilometer-wide coma and a 23 kilometer nucleus. It’s tail is approximately 75 thousand kilometers long and is exceptionally short compared to many comets. The angle of approach minimizes the visibility of the tail as earth is between the comet and the sun. It is the Department of Defense’s suspicion that this is intentional. These factors combined led to the late discovery of Comet Armastus-1.

The composition of the comet (not including the structures) is as follows:

81% Water

13% Carbon Volatiles

1% other trace gasses

6% unknown material

The presence of an unknown material present inside the comet, identified as similar but distinct in signature from the alloy used in the structure, suggests two possibilities:

1. This material is common within whatever foreign system the comet originated from.
2. There are additional structures located within the nucleus of the comet.

The speed of the comet is, as of March 16^th, 13.7 Km/s. which is unusually slow for a comet of this type.

Section Three: Origin and trajectory

Work began on identifying the origin of Comet soon after the discovery and identification of the structures. By March 11^th all the following had been identified within a reasonable range of certainty.

Comet Armastus-1 and it’s sister comets Armastus-2 and Armastus-3 all seem to have originated from the same direction in space.

Using the New Standard Spatial Mapping System (NSSM) the determined path is 320.32x-158.60z PT 323.77z-156.12x relative to our sun with an error margin of 0.4%.

There are no nearby systems along that route. The closest star to the trajectory is Rigel, though it remains outside of the margin of error. This leaves three possibilities:

1. The Comets were sent from interstellar space, likely repurposed extrasolar debris. Possibly from the solar system’s Oort Cloud.
2. The comets originated from Rigel and experienced an unexplained detour in travel.
3. The comets arrived in our solar system by other means.

A journey from Rigel at the comet’s speed, traveling at the comet’s present speed of 0.000046% lightspeed, would consume upwards of 27 million years. This does not necessarily rule the possibility out, but does make it considered an extremely unlikely scenario.

The precise trajectory between the three comets suggests a level of intent as well as a level of technological advancement in excess of what humanity currently possesses.

The current path, barring any change, will take the comet between the earth and the moon, impacting neither and maintaining almost exact equidistance between the two bodies. The slow rotation of the nucleus will mean the structure will be aligned with earth on:

March 23^rd approx. 1:30-14:15 Est

March 25^th approx. 16:45-3:30 March 26^th Est

March 28^th approx. 7:30-20:15 Est

If the structure is a thruster, the most likely opportunity to change course to impact earth will be March 22^nd approx. 8:30 Est. Windows will reoccur approx. every 2 days.

A full chart of potential attack or thrust windows is attached. (Document B)

Section four: Analysis of structures

The structures on I/2025E1 are of primary interest to the Department of Defense. There exists five confirmed structures. The largest is a structure (Designated Primary Facility) in the shape of a large cylinder capped on the outward face by an aperture of twelve fins. This structure measures 32.1 meters in height above the ice and 25.3 meters in diameter. The aperture measures 23.1 meters in diameter It is presumed by the design that this aperture is capable of opening to a hollow interior.

The four smaller structures (Designated Sub-Facilities A-D) are arranged symmetrically around the central facility. Each minor structure measures approximately 7 meters by 7 meters and protrudes from the comet to a height of 3 meters.

Full diagram of the known structure is attached (Document C)

Radiation has been detected from the Primary Facility. Experts believe this is consistent with an unshielded, small, nuclear reactor. the radiation signatures are not consistent with nuclear or atomic weapons. Relatively minuscule amounts of radiation have been detected from Sub-Facility B. This signature is consistent with a small stockpile of fissile materials. Estimations place the number of fissile materials stored as minimal, suggesting long term use after passing earth is not a priority. The facility is large enough to hold a significant amount of material, giving credence to the theory of long-term space travel. None of the evidence regarding radiation suggests any significant shielding attempts. Radiation levels on the exterior of the Primary Facility would be lethal to a human with minimal exposure time.

Each Sub-Facility is connected to the Primary Facility by a series of cables. These cables are not secured to the ice, likely due to the shifting nature of comets, and are strung freely between the structures. Sub-Facility C has been partially uncovered by a presumed ice shift and some extent of it’s under structure is visible. There appears to be an underground connection made of the same material to the Primary Facility, suggesting the set of five structures may be connected fully under the ice. No connections between Sub-Facility C to the other Sub-Facilities have been observed.

No visible damage of any sort to the structures has been observed despite craters in the surrounding ice. One incident of a detached cable was briefly observed. (See: Section 5: analysis of movement.) The exact nature of the construction material is unclear at this time, but the lack of damage suggests a degree of durability unmatched by manmade materials.

Present theory within both the Department of Defense and the wider intellectual community proposes the following:

1. The Primary Facility is the intended focus of the complex. The structure’s face is intended to open at some point in the future for unknown purposes.
2. The Sub-Facilities are intended as support or storage of the Primary Facility
3. There is significant further structure under the ice, possibly connecting all facilities and potentially additional buildings into one structure.
4. The builder’s technological level far exceeds mankind’s.
5. The facility has been designed for long term use, but has nearly reached the end of its intended lifespan.
6. Lack of radiation shielding suggests the facility may be automated and that stealth against an advanced civilization is not a priority for the builders.

Section Five: Analysis of Movement

At 13:40 on 3/15/25 the James Webb Space Telescope, assigned until further notice to observe the structures on I/2025E1, detected motion near Sub-Facility A. Further analysis shows a small asteroid impacted one of the cables connecting from Sub-Facility A to the Primary Facility and dislodged it from it’s connection to Sub-Facility A. The cable began to drift away from the facility towards the tail of the comet, still attached on one end to the Primary Facility.

Five minutes later another incident of motion followed with a previously unseen airlock on Sub-Facility D opening and disgorging a metallic object  approximately 1 meter in height and .35 meters in diameter. Lights could be seen but not identified from inside the structure while the hatchway was open. The object possessed four manipulator arms arranged symmetrically around a central cylinder. Analysis has suggested that this object was some form of remote or automated maintenance drone.

The machine proceeded to maneuver towards the dislodged cable using what appear to be small maneuvering thrusters emplaced throughout its cylinder and manipulator arms. The exact mechanism of the thrusters is unknown at this time, as only small bursts of light could be observed.

The machine gathered the detached cable end with its manipulator arms. It then proceeded to maneuver towards the location the cable had become loosed from and reattach it. After this task was complete the machine maneuvered back into the still open airlock and the door shut behind it. The entire incident lasted thirty-seven seconds.

From this event the Department of Defense and its included researchers has theorized the following:

1. The extraterrestrial equipment is not invulnerable.
2. The facility remains operational and active.
3. The facility contains some degree of self repair capabilities.
4. The presence of light suggests either visually guided repair machines or the presence of extraterrestrial life dependent on light present on the comet.
5. The extraterrestrial technology, while advanced, posses requirements and weaknesses and seem to conform to known laws of physics.
6. The extraterrestrial facility makes use, to some extent, of robotic drones or other remote devices. These devices are considerably more advanced than manmade equivalents.
7. The design of the machine is highly reminiscent of the Facility’s structure, suggesting either a common cultural or biological predisposition towards this design.

Section Six: Threat Assessment Scenarios

The following are theorized scenarios for the purpose of threat assessment. On the ground reality will likely differ significantly. These scenarios should be used for planning and preparation of response. Each scenario looks at a different potential intent and purpose behind the structures.

Scenario A: Interstellar probe

Low odds

Situation: Further investigation reveals an entirely unoccupied structure and extensive sensor suites, telescopes and listening devices. Aperture opens to reveal a large telescope that observes earth for the duration of its passing, signals are received, destined for outer space, that indicate transmission of vital information on the state of earth to unknown extraterrestrial actors.

Threat analysis: Mankind has been sending space probes out of our solar system since 1977. We do not hold hostile intent towards extraterrestrial life. Revelation of the Armastus-1 comet does not necessarily indicate immediate or long-term threat to planetary security. The threat in this scenario originates in the potential exposure of planetary defense secrets. Long-term, the primary concern lies in identification and communication with the extraterrestrial civilization of origin. The information gathered could, however, be an effective reconnaissance mission for further extraterrestrial action. The long-term nature of this probing action would suggest a lack of immediate action from any extraterrestrial forces but does not guarantee it.

The current status of Armastus-2 and Armastus-3 in relation to structures is not yet known. Presuming the existence of similar or identical structures, a primary concern in this scenario should be the acquisition of one of these comets into stable earth orbit for further study.

The overall threat of this scenario is low.

Suggested actions:

Of primary concern should be the identification of what information was collected and transmitted.

If information transmitted is military in nature a widespread reorganization and relocation of military equipment and facilities is recommended.

Increased human space presence in preparation for potential hostilities.

Formation of a US led planetary diplomatic corps to contact the extraterrestrials.

Capture of the Armastus-2 or Armastus-3 comets should be attempted.

Scenario B: Mining Facility

Low odds

Situation: Further investigation reveals extensive mining and refining equipment present on Armastus-1 and the following comets. The Primary Facility is revealed to be a manufacturing and refining hub. Following it’s pass by the earth the comet activates hidden thrusters and maneuvers into the asteroid belt, onto the moon, or otherwise towards some celestial body with significant resources and begins large scale mining. A signal is detected destined for outer space announcing its arrival and beginning of resource gathering.

Threat analysis: Large scale space travel presents significant logistical challenges. One potential solution to these problems would be the establishment of resource extraction within the target system before large-scale arrival. This beachhead, beyond the problematic fact of jeopardizing the sovereignty of humankind over the solar system, poses a serious threat to planetary security. Once a decentralized extractive effort is established the effectiveness of a strike becomes nearly useless.

Long term, removal of resources from the solar system poses a risk of permanently handicapping humanities ability to develop a space presence within the solar system. Extraterrestrial construction efforts within the system could quickly cascade to such a level that human resistance to an attack would be made useless. Even if the resources are removed from the system and not used to bootstrap a massive extraterrestrial presence the threat is significant. The history of colonialism on earth shows exceptional evidence that extractive missions can be extremely detrimental towards native populations.

The overall threat of this scenario is moderate/high

Suggested actions:

An immediate strike should be considered on the Facilities before decentralized extraction operations can begin.

Rapid US led human presence in the solar system may be crucial to preventing total loss of access to space-based resources.

Contact with the extraterrestrial presence to negotiate removal of the operations should be attempted if allowed to establish decentralized operations.

The capture of an extraterrestrial mining facility should be attempted to help bootstrap human efforts to counter decentralized operations.

In a worst-case scenario of total decentralized operations, space-based guerilla tactics should be employed to slow extraterrestrial mining efforts. A simultaneous nuclear strike on all known facilities should be considered in such a scenario.

Scenario C: Extraterrestrial Habitat.

Moderate odds.

Situation: Further investigation reveals extensive structures spreading throughout the comet. Primary Facility is determined to be a space dock for small extraterrestrial craft. Extraterrestrial life forms are detected in large numbers. After earth flyby the comet activates hidden thrusters to take up orbit around earth or another planet/asteroid. Smaller craft are used for small scale mining and construction of additional habitats or support facilities, but no attempt at decentralized extraction operations is attempted. Military equipment is detected but seems defensive in nature.

Threat analysis: A non-threatening extraterrestrial habitat within the solar system will upend large portions of society but will also offer significant opportunities. Presuming peaceful intentions by the extraterrestrials, the opportunities for cultural, technological, and material exchange is immense. This scenario is not without risks. Any attempt at communication or contact with the habitat must be undertaken carefully.

If further extraterrestrial presences or rapid reproduction of existing specimens is determined, the situation becomes grave. The history of human colonialism is rife with examples of native populations disrupted, displaced, decimated, or destroyed by technologically superior colonists. Over a longer term an extraterrestrial population in the solar system becomes a progressively larger threat despite an initially low level.

The overall threat of this scenario is low.

Suggested actions:

Unlike most scenarios the extraterrestrial habitat calls for restraint and caution rather than immediate reaction. Contact should be established if possible.

An increased US-led presence in space with a focus on the development of defensive countermeasures towards potential hostilities.

Formation of a unified planetary diplomatic corps.

Close observation of the behavioral patterns, technological level, and purpose of the extraterrestrial habitat.

Under no circumstances should extraterrestrial vessels be allowed to land on earth without prior diplomatic contact and biohazard screening.

Scenario D: Thrust device

Moderate-high odds

Situation: Further investigation reveals the structure to be a space vessel embedded in ice. The Primary Facility opens to reveal a large thrust engine capable of propelling the comet nearly anywhere in the solar system. Upon entering earth orbit the thrusters activates and pushes the comet towards the surface of earth.

Threat analysis. Comet Armastus-1 has a mass of approximately 21 million metric tons. Most projections indicate that a direct hit, despite much of the comet burning up in the atmosphere, has the potential to wipe out much or all life on earth. Comet Armastus-1 has a mass moderately smaller than the Chicxulub asteroid that wiped out 75% of life on earth.

Outside of direct impact damage, such an impact on land would cause enough debris to be thrown into the atmosphere to create a global cooling extremely detrimental to human life. Current estimations place this cooling at lasting over 30 years. Average temperature would plummet to around 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Global crop, electricity production and infrastructure failures would eliminate an estimated 85% of the surviving human population. This scenario does not take into account the following two comets. Their possessing similar structure and intent would ensure the extinction of humanity and the reduction of earth to a world devoid of life with a 95% certainty. In most projections, the earth would have less than a thirty minute window of warning following a change in course from the comet during the launch window.

The only thing earth possesses that the rest of the solar system does not is life and the byproducts of life. It is hoped that even in this scenario the extraterrestrial forces have interests on earth utilizing that life to a greater or lesser extent. They possess the ability to eliminate it entirely, if their intention is to do so.

Overall threat of this scenario is extreme.

Recommended actions:

In the event such an event is detected the one chance at preserving earth in a recognizable form would be a massive nuclear strike with the aim of vaporizing the comet. Intercontinental ballistic missiles should be prepared for sufficient travel as soon as possible. Rival nations should be informed of these plans and preparations as they are underway to minimize the danger of accidental escalation.

Key personnel, government leadership and sufficient numbers of people to maintain human existence should be moved to secure underground facilities before the launch window. In the event this scenario takes place military force should be authorized to protect these facilities from public desperation for as long as possible. Raven Rock Mountain Complex is suggested as an adequate facility for key government personnel, additional complexes should be utilized to distribute survival. Secrecy of these preparations should be maintained to prevent compromise of these facilities and to minimize panic.

Following a strike, announcing unconditional surrender to extraterrestrial forces should be strongly considered to prevent the strikes of the following comets.

Public awareness of this possibility and it’s likelihood should be minimized by all possible means to avoid further inflaming public panic. Under no circumstances should this report be released. Theories like this scenario existing in the public sphere should be discredited.

A preemptive strike, before the comet reaches the launch window, should be considered carefully. This scenario has the potential to end life on earth, a preemptive strike has the potential to start an interstellar war where one was not necessarily imminent.

Scenario E: Weaponry

Moderate odds.

Situation: Further investigation reveals extensive amounts of what is determined to be offensive and defensive weaponry present on comet Armastus-1. The Primary Facility opens to reveal an arsenal of missiles or energy and kinetic weapons. Upon entering earth orbit, the weapons open fire and eliminate military command and control, political leadership, major military bases, nuclear silos, spaceports, large military formations and/or population and industrial centers.

Threat analysis:

Sufficient advanced weaponry located on Armastus-1 could pose a serious risk to planetary security. With enough intelligence of earth, a coordinated extraterrestrial strike poses a risk of total decapitation of military and political control. In the event of such a strike it is expected that the public would experience additional panic and civil society may collapse. Such a strike would likely be a precursor to a full-scale invasion.

Interstellar military action is theorized to be a logistically taxing project. Extraterrestrial forces have not, thus far, demonstrated any ability to travel faster than light nor break any other laws of physics. The existence of a theorized nuclear reactor in the Primary Facility further reinforces the theory of a manageable tech gap between humanity and the extraterrestrial forces. Therefore, an invasion by extraterrestrial forces would likely require extensive logistical support and possible non-earth bases within the solar system.

Space travel is difficult, and largely limited by the amount of mass moved. The trajectory and size of the comet shows the extraterrestrial’s propulsion technology is vastly superior, but all known and realistically theorized methods are still restricted by mass. Extraterrestrial forces should be assumed to be highly elite, well equipped and limited in number. No extraterrestrial weaponry has been observed, however, it is expected to exceed mankind’s arsenal in sophistication.

Nuclear, hyper velocity kinetic, energy, plasma, or other weapons not yet theorized of, could pose a risk not only to planetary defense but to the global population. It is theorized, however, that if the extraterrestrial intent was to remove humanity from the planet, then Scenario D would be employed rather than this scenario. Limited attacks designed to pressure the planet into surrender could be expected. Establishment of earth orbit stations or space vessels to provide fire support to invading extraterrestrial forces is logical and likely. Such vessels or stations could be expected to possess the ability to intercept nuclear or conventional ground-to-orbit missiles and dislodging their presence may prove beyond mankind’s current capabilities.

No evidence has been observed to suggest a further extraterrestrial presence in the solar system at this time.

Suggested actions:

If offensive weapons systems are observed on Comet I-2025 E1 a preemptive nuclear strike should be undertaken.

US military forces should be dispersed away from military bases to prevent mass casualties from singular strikes.

US leadership, civilian and military, should be dispersed and placed in secure underground facilities. The dispersion required by this plan conflicts with the plan for Scenario D where a gathering of leadership is preferable within more secure facilities than are available for dispersion. Careful consideration must be given as to which plan to follow.

Mobile nuclear weapons should be dispersed and kept in constant irregular motion throughout the attack windows to prevent elimination of the US nuclear arsenal in its entirety. Rival nations should be notified of this action to prevent accidental escalation.

In the event of successful strikes and an imminent or ongoing invasion guerilla tactics tailored to observed extraterrestrial tactics and technology should be developed with haste. Attacks of opportunity on extraterrestrial logistics infrastructure and units should be taken.

Extraterrestrial technology should be acquired at all costs for reverse engineering and research.

A unified planetary defense organization should be established to coordinate global efforts. Diplomatic efforts should be undertaken vigorously to ease relations with rival nations, methods up to and including offering territorial concessions should be considered. Under no circumstances should an international war be fought while planetary defense activities are under way.

In the unlikely event that other governments, especially rival nations, side with, surrender to, or otherwise allow extraterrestrial presences within their borders, the situation must be assessed carefully. An extraterrestrial invasion with logistical, military, and civilian support from a rival nation may not be able to be defeated conventionally. Efforts may at that time need to shift to an approach of resistance.

Section 7: Threat of Global Unrest

Discontent domestically and abroad has spiked sharply since the March 14^th disclosure of extraterrestrial structures. In many areas this has spilled over into rioting, insurrection and open revolt. Membership in domestic terror organizations has skyrocketed in the past three days, and is expected to continue its Increase. Concerningly, there has also been a rise in membership among organizations catered to advocate specific responses towards extraterrestrial forces. The following is a brief overview of such organizations.

• The Temple of Arrival (ToA)

Perhaps the most prominent example of an organization gaining significant power within the public following the Armastus-1 disclosure. The Temple of Arrival advocates a policy of worshipfullness and eventual surrender to extraterrestrial forces. The ToA credits most of its success to a March 2^nd video entitled “they are coming”. This video was originally only available to full members or those whom full members trusted to share the video with.The video has since been made publicly available. The video posits the imminent arrival of extraterrestrial forces on earth for the purpose of “testing” humanity’s resolve and peaceful nature. The ToA has claimed (to full members only until March 14^th) since it’s founding in 2011 to have been in contact with extraterrestrial forces coming to our solar system with the goal of the “testing” of humanity.

Their methods involve charity and community outreach work that seems to be a calibrated recruitment effort. Current full membership within the United States is estimated at 300000, with an additional 1.3 million affiliate members. The identity of the groups founder and current leader “the Emissary” is not known at this time. The FBI has been investigating the ToA since 2020 following an upsurge in membership during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Their claims of contact with extraterrestrial forces are unsubstantiated at this time, though additional study and infiltration is suggested to rule out direct extraterrestrial involvement. If a connection is established, it is recommended that the ToA be declared a domestic terror group and it’s activities banned with prejudice.

• The Brigade

The brigade is an affiliate organization with legitimate anti-ToA activist group “the Defiants”. It was founded in 2021 following the ToA upsurge as a group dedicated to direct action and activism to disrupt ToA activities and recruitment. While the Defiants undertake this work via public awareness campaigns and small peaceful protest actions, the Brigade takes a considerably more militant approach. Most Brigade actions, deal at minimum, a degree of property damage and multiple injuries and 3 deaths have been directly connected to their protests.

On December 24^th 2023 a ToA food distribution kitchen in Arco, Idaho was bombed resulting in 4 deaths and 28 injuries. Among the dead was the Arco ToA Congregation’s leader. The FBI was unable to identify the bomber and he is still believed to be at large. An anonymous online post on the Defiants’ forums claimed responsibility for the terror attack by the Brigade. The Defiants quickly severed ties with the Brigade and turned over large amounts of information on their members to the FBI investigation. Much of this information was later revealed to be misleading and current theory holds that the entire Brigade presence on the Defiants’ forums was solely for misinformation and recruitment purposes.

On March 15^th, only one day after public disclosure of extraterrestrial structures on Armastus-1, the Defiants formally mended relations with the Brigade. Brigade members resumed recruitment efforts immediately. Their current numbers are unknown but are suspected to have increased significantly since March 14^th

• The Hermes Foundation

The Hermes Foundation is a gathering of scientists, researchers, minor political leaders, engineers and other professionals to the end of advocating for peaceful first contact with extraterrestrial forces. The organization itself does not yet legally exist but was announced on March 15^th. The Hermes Foundation is not considered a radical group at this time, its development is to be encouraged, but attention must be paid to its approach to extraterrestrial forces in the future. The current approach of the Hermes Foundation is to attempt peaceful first contact with the extraterrestrial forces, which is also the hope of the Department of Defense, with military action being a last resort. The only considerable cause for concern at this time with the Hermes Foundation is their first meeting is to be held during the first attack window. This is believed to be coincidence, but investigation is required to rule out cooperation or control to the purpose of gathering a large number of scientific minds into a soft target by extraterrestrial forces.

• Threat of spontaneous protest.

Another threat to domestic security lies in spontaneous public disruption caused by panic. As of March 17^th the panic surrounding the initial disclosure of extraterrestrial structures on Armastus-1 has led to mass rioting, thousands of deaths and billions of dollars in damages worldwide. These riots and revolts are, on occasion, organized. An estimated 78% of known arrival riots, however, have been tentatively determined to be spontaneous and leaderless, with 19% of the remaining beginning as such before being co-opted by new or existing organizations. A spontaneous nationwide rioting seized Egypt, particularly the capital of Cairo, on March 15^th. The following day the government has entirely collapsed and the military and police largely defected to join the insurrectionists. As of the 17^th Egypt remains in a state of anarchy and it is unclear how the situation will resolve. Similar situations have played out in Estonia and Singapore.

Rioting within the US has reached levels unseen in our nations history. Riots in the Brooklyn neighborhood of New York City on the 16^th of March forced elements of the Army National Guard 42^nd infantry division to retreat to prevent mass civilian casualties. Currently a self declared “Brooklyn Self Defense Council(BSDC)” made up of local left wing militants claims control over the neighborhood. The  BSDC has already proven ineffective at preventing further rioting and the situation is not expected to maintain its current status. The 42^nd infantry division is preparing to secure the neighborhood as of the 18^th.

The threat of further rioting and insurrection is high. Efforts must be taken to deescalate the situation. As the Armastus-1 comet draws closer public attention and panic are expected to intensify.

Use of military force by the US Army or Air Force should be considered only as a last resort. Any public attention on a mass civilian casualty event caused by US forces will undoubtedly cause the situation to deteriorate further. A policy of de-escalation and rectification should be pursued to calm the situation.

Section 8: Conclusion

The situation facing the United States and the world at large is unprecedented in human history. Decisions made in the next week will shape humanity for centuries to come. It is hoped that this report will assist US leadership to make informed decisions regarding the approach to the extraterrestrial threat, domestic unrest and the future of our nation.

Key takeaways:

The purpose of the extraterrestrial structures remains unclear, but the structures are active and appear intact.

The threat of direct alien attack is by current understanding most likely in the following windows:

• March 23^rd approx. 1:30-14:15 Est
• (Closest pass) March 25^th approx. 16:45-3:30 March 26^th Est
• March 28^th approx. 7:30-20:15 Est

A thrust attack, launching the comet into the earth is most likely at:

• March 22^nd approx. 8:30 Est.

A substantially increased human presence in space is vital for long-term human survival and independence.

Earthbound conflict should be avoided at all costs for the duration of the crisis.

Careful consideration must be given to the immediate response to comet Armastus-1.

The threat of global unrest is high and may require a delicate approach to avoid escalation.

With this in mind it is hoped that informed decisions can be made by US leadership. The Department of Defense stands ready to execute orders for planetary and national defense.